from The Textbook Letter,
May-June 1999
Reviewing a high-school book in world history
Human Heritage: A World History
1999. 712 pages. ISBN of the student's edition: 0-02-663895-9.
Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 936 Eastwind Drive, Westerville, Ohio 43081.
(Glencoe/McGraw-Hill is a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies.)
Are We Having Fun Yet?
William J. Bennetta
The 1995 version of Human Heritage: A World History was
described in two reviews -- one written by William Weber, the other
by Charles Paul -- that ran in The Textbook Letter for
March-April 1995. Both reviewers commented favorably on the 1995 book's
geographic content, but both found Human Heritage
unacceptable as a world-history textbook.
William Weber said that the 1995 Human Heritage didn't
deserve to carry the subtitle A World History, because it
paid little attention to anything besides the history of the West.
He also found that it was pedagogically obsolete, that it made
little effort to help students build their intellectual skills, and
that too many of the exercises presented to students were fanciful
or unrealistic or unworkable.
Charles Paul said that Human Heritage lacked coherence and
continuity. He saw some commendable passages here and there, but he
observed that the book's text was degraded by serious omissions, by
many errors of fact, and by a style of prose that blended "peculiar
diction, muddled phrasing, and a propensity to raise questions
without answering them." The 1995 Human Heritage, Paul said,
represented "an attempted compromise between tradition and faddism,"
and the attempt was a failure.
The 1999 version of Human Heritage is, for all practical
purposes, interchangeable with the 1995. The text and
illustrations that appeared in the 1995 book have been recycled,
virtually unchanged. Obvious errors remain uncorrected,
incomprehensible passages remain incomprehensible, meaningless
sentences remain meaningless, and the book still is laden with
traditional fictions and faddish pretensions that are downright
silly.
On the traditional side, for instance, Human Heritage is
still peddling Christian religious lore -- including the notion
that Jesus was born in Bethlehem -- as history [see note 1, below].
To comply with current fads, Human Heritage continues to
offer multi-culti absurdities, such as the fancy that the
Australian aborigines "have always lived in harmony with their
environment" [note 2]. Ugh!
Instead of rectifying the many defects of content and presentation
that made the 1995 Human Heritage unacceptable, Glencoe's
writers and editors have devoted their talents to decorating the
1999 book with new gewgaws. Some of these are "Multimedia Activity"
items, including four in which the Glencoe writers cynically pretend
to give instructions for finding information on the Internet [note 3].
Most of the new decorations, however, are boxed items that have
been tossed into the page-margins, under the rubrics "Then . . . &
Now" and "Fun Facts." A "Fun Facts" box on page 353, for example,
tells us that Mongols entirely destroyed Kiev, and that the only
building which was left standing was the cathedral of Saint Sophia.
Reading the "Fun Facts" box on page 450, we see that Martin Luther
had a close call with a lightning bolt, and that this led him to
abandon the study of law and to enter a monastery.
Are we having fun yet?
Sampling the Pages
My statement that the 1999 version of Human Heritage is
practically interchangeable with the 1995 version rests on a formal
sampling of pages. In both the 1999 version and the 1995 version,
the body of the book has 667 pages. To search for differences, I
have randomly selected 63 pages in the body of the 1999 version
(starting with page 3 and ending with page 667), and I have compared
each of them with the like-numbered page in the 1995 version. Here
are my findings:
- In 43 cases the page in the 1999 version is identical with the
corresponding page in the 1995.
- In 14 cases the page in the 1999 version has gained a new "Then
. . . & Now" or "Fun Facts" gewgaw. Otherwise, it is identical with
the corresponding page in the 1995.
- In two cases the page in the 1999 version has been redesigned,
and a small amount of old material has been discarded, so that the
page can carry an Internet gewgaw.
- On page 600 a map's color scheme has been altered, and a
photograph has been replaced. In the 1995 version, page 600 had a
photo of a monument in Kenya. Now it has a photo of a space
vehicle.
- On page 650, in the page-margin, a small photo of an
artilleryman has been replaced by a "Fun Facts" box: In 1998, we
learn, McDonald's had 15 fast-food stands in Moscow, and these were
selling "more than a million orders of french fries each month."
Page 650 also has four new paragraphs of text about economic turmoil
in Russia and eastern Europe, along with a revised "Section Review."
- Page 652 displays new text about "World Challenges." This page
has also acquired a "Fun Facts" box which reports that Kuwait's
annual production of petroleum is about 60 million metric tons, and
Saudi Arabia's is about 320 million.
After I finished my formal sampling of pages, I did some casual
reading of the 1999 Human Heritage. As I toured its
fun-filled pages, I noticed three more things that must be remarked
here:
- This book is loaded with illustrations that are just worthless.
There are scores of them -- meaningless reproductions of pictures,
with nothing to indicate when, where or why the pictures were made,
or by whom. Many of these illustrations appear in page-margins and
bear tiny captions such as "Painting of Mycenaean Woman," "Painting
of Roman Couple," "Painting of Philip II," "Painting of Legionary,"
"Painting of Augustine," "Painting of Ivan the Great," "Painting of
Copernicus," "Painting of Renaissance Merchant," and so on. Is
that "Painting of Copernicus" an authentic portrait? Is it a
fanciful picture created as an illustration for a 19th-century
romance? Is it something that was invented for Glencoe by a
commercial artist? There is no way to tell. Glencoe's staff
evidently wanted to make sure that these illustrations wouldn't
convey any historical information at all. Still, the "Painting of"
illustrations are not entirely lacking in significance, because some
of them have erroneous captions that tell us this: Glencoe's
designers and illustrators don't know that a mosaic or a woodcut or
an engraving isn't a painting.
- The section labeled "The Hebrews" (in chapter 6) is a
protracted exercise in deceit, with plenty of barefaced lies.
Ignoring 150 years' worth of biblical scholarship, Glencoe's hacks
have contrived some five pages of fake "history" consisting chiefly
of myths -- complete with Moses and the Hebrews' hasty hike across
the floor of the Red Sea. The text is rotten with evasions,
ambiguities and fuzzy locutions, obviously devised to confuse
students and to trick them into believing that all the tales devised
by the ancient Hebrews are accounts of real persons and real events.
This suffices, by itself, to disqualify Human Heritage from
any consideration as a history textbook.
- Looking at page 660, I see that Glencoe is promoting one of the
more egregious phonies of our time, Mother Teresa of Calcutta. The
Mother T promo in Human Heritage is not as voluminous as the
Mother T rubbish that I recently found in McDougal Littell's
World History: Patterns of Interaction, [note 4] but it is
just as duplicitous and just as oblivious to history. Glencoe's
book tells students this:
By 1998, the world's population totaled more than 5.8 billion
people. The work of Roman Catholic nun Mother Teresa helped make
people aware of hardships in developing nations, such as India. By
2050, some experts say that 80 percent of the world's population
would live in less developed regions, where food shortages are
already a concern. . . . [page 660]
To anyone who remembers how Mother T inveighed against
contraception and family-planning programs, and how she exploited
some of the poorest people in India to promote her mercenary
schemes, that passage will be particularly offensive. In my view,
it is another instance of naked deceit that suffices to exclude
Human Heritage from any consideration as a history textbook.
Notes
- No one knows where Jesus was born. The common notion that he
was born in Bethlehem reflects a story in the Gospel of St. Luke --
a story that is highly anomalous because, unlike most tales about
Jesus, it contains claims which can be tested against historical
facts. Such testing shows that the story is fiction. A detailed
examination of this matter will appear in a forthcoming issue of
The Textbook Letter, as one of several articles that will
show how schoolbooks endorse religious superstitions and disseminate
fake "information" about the history of religious sects.
[return to text]
- Glencoe's harmonious aborigines appear in a "Culture Close-up"
spread on pages 48 and 49. When William Weber reviewed the 1995
Human Heritage, he said that the "Culture Close-up" items
would "probably do more to mislead students than to teach them."
That is certainly true of the Australian-aborigine "Close-up,"
which is laughable. It includes the harmony nonsense, a
picture-caption that has nothing to do with the adjacent picture, and a
caption which declares that the newly arrived aborigines hopped
from their canoes and discovered "the eucalyptus tree," as if there
were but one. In reality, Australia has more than 700 species of
eucalypt, comprising seven major groups. [return to text]
- The instructions are absurd and useless, for they will be quite
incomprehensible to anyone who does not already know how to conduct
an Internet search. Moreover, the Glencoe writers flagrantly
promote the delusion that anything which shows up on the Internet is
legitimate information. They don't warn the student that the
Internet is loaded with bogus Web sites which dispense phony
"information" concocted by pressure groups, hucksters and crackpots.
[return to text]
- See "She Wasn't My Mother" in The Textbook Letter
for November-December 1998. [return to text]
William J. Bennetta is a professional editor, a fellow of the
California Academy of Sciences, the president of The Textbook
League, and the editor of The Textbook Letter. He writes
often about the propagation of quackery, false "science" and false
"history" in schoolbooks.
return to top
go to Home Page
read our Index List, which shows all the textbooks, curriculum manuals,
videos and other items that are considered on this Web site
subscribe to The Textbook Letter
order back issues of The Textbook Letter
support the work of The Textbook League
contact The Textbook League by e-mail
The Textbook Letter is published, copyrighted and distributed by
The Textbook League (P.O. Box 51, Sausalito, California 94966)
|