This article appeared in the "Editor's File"
in The Textbook Letter for July-August 1994.
Advanced Fakery
William J. Bennetta
Textbook-writers use various devices to dupe students, and the most
common device is the printing of "information" that is simply false.
Another trick -- one that seems equally evil -- is the printing of
stuff that is absurd. Such stuff is surely not true, but neither is
it false. It can't be true or false because it has no meaning at
all. It is fed to students, usually in the form of cheesy little
slogans, and the students are led to believe that they are learning
something. In fact, though, they are being duped in ways that entail
the stifling of thought and the undermining of reason itself.
Absurdity has gained new prominence during the past few years, as
schoolbook-writers have promoted a new kind of nonsense: fake
anthropology. This odd endeavor blends racism with boosterism,
wrapping both in an anthropological disguise. The slogans of fake
anthropology are showing up in schoolbooks for various subjects, as
some examples will show:
- Merrill Earth Science, published by the Glencoe Division of
Macmillan/McGraw-Hill, says that "The Pueblo people of the Southwest
had one of the most highly developed civilizations to ever inhabit
North America" (page 117). Intelligent students will wonder what
"highly developed" means, and what criteria are used in judging how
"developed" a civilization was (or is), but the students will be out
of luck. Merrill's writers don't explain.
- The middle volume of SciencePlus, a three-book series issued by
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, says this about the plains Indians of
North America: "These people had a highly developed society but no
permanent architecture" (page 294). If students wonder how a "highly
developed" society can be identified, or what "highly developed" may
mean, that's just too bad. The Holt writers give no clue.
- Glencoe's American-history book Challenge of Freedom says that
"Many advanced Indian societies had developed in the Americas by the
time the first Europeans came to the new lands" (page 17).
"Advanced"? "Advanced" in what way? "Advanced" in comparison with
what? Glencoe's writers explain nothing.
The prize for fake anthropology, however, must be given to
Walsworth's American-history book ". . . to form a more perfect
union . . . ." In a shabby, false account of the slave trade, this
book casually declares that "The African civilization [in the 1500s]
was as advanced as that of Europe." That's all that the book says.
It doesn't tell which African peoples were civilized, it doesn't tell
which people merited the unique title "the African civilization," it
doesn't tell what "advanced" means, and it surely doesn't explain the
rating system which led to the explicitly quantitative claim that
"the African civilization" and European civilization were "advanced"
to the same degree.
The title page of Walsworth's book says that the book's author is
one David A. Bice. I have written to Bice three times, asking him to
explain his claim and to tell me the criteria that he used for rating
civilizations and assessing how "advanced" they were. He has not
replied. I am not surprised.
Along with their devotion to sloganeering and their consistent
failure to explain anything, the practitioners of fake anthropology
have another quaint habit: No matter what group of people they
consider, they always announce that the group was "advanced" or
"highly developed." They seem not to know of any group that was
primitive, although the very idea that some group was "advanced" must
mean that some other group was (by comparison) primitive, backward,
static or retrograde. This is clear to anyone who is capable of
thinking, but the clowns who dispense fake anthropology are plainly
hostile to thinking and are concerned only with getting students to
absorb meaningless slogans -- slogans that, I infer, are intended to
promote some sort of racial or political ideology.
As I remarked earlier, the injection of absurdity into schoolbooks is
an attack on reason itself. I hope that schools will immediately
reject books that deal in fake anthropology, but I know that such
books are bound to get into classrooms here and there. Let me point
out, then, that an alert teacher can use fake anthropology as
material for a lesson in analytical thinking, giving students some
insight into how charlatans trade in unexplained terms and
unsupported claims.
William J. Bennetta is a professional editor, a fellow of the
California Academy of Sciences, the president of The Textbook
League, and the editor of The Textbook Letter. He writes frequently
about the propagation of quackery, false "science" and false
"history" in schoolbooks.
return to top
go to Home Page
read our Index List, which shows all the textbooks, curriculum manuals,
videos and other items that are considered on this Web site
subscribe to The Textbook Letter
order back issues of The Textbook Letter
support the work of The Textbook League
contact The Textbook League by e-mail
The Textbook Letter is published, copyrighted and distributed by
The Textbook League (P.O. Box 51, Sausalito, California 94966) |
|