
Environmental Science: A Study of Interrelationships
The book is organized into five parts and twenty chapters.
Part One, called "Interrelatedness," contains only two chapters.
The first of these, titled "Environmental Interrelationships,"
starts by presenting the writers' conception of environmental
science:
To the extent that this book deals with traditional science, the
science consists largely of biology. There is almost no
chemistry or physics, so high-school students can use the book
even if their previous instruction in science has been limited
to, say, a course in general science or in 10th-grade biology.
Having defined environmental science, the writers provide some
historical context for their subject by offering a quotation from
Henry David Thoreau. The quotation sets forth a theme -- the
idea that our species as a part of nature -- which will unify the
book throughout:
The rest of the opening chapter is given to a survey of current
environmental concerns in six regions of North America. The
second chapter, "Environmental Ethics," discusses various moral
attitudes that people express regarding environmental issues. In
the main, the writers hold in check any tendency to preach.
Part Two, "Ecological Principles and Their Application," deals
chiefly with how organisms interact with their physical
environment. After introducing a tiny bit of chemistry, the
writers turn to equipping the student with a grasp of basic
ecology, including the concepts of communities and ecosystems.
Then they provide a chapter about population dynamics and a
chapter about human populations in particular.
Part Three, "Energy," contains three chapters, the first two of
which give an overview of energy sources and consumption;
particular attention is given to the historical role of fossil
fuels in the development of the world's major economies. The
third chapter is devoted entirely to nuclear power.
Part Four, "Human Influences on Ecosystems," looks at a broad
range of issues, offering chapters about land-use planning, soil,
agriculture (including the use and regulation of pesticides), and
the management of water.
Part Five, "Pollution and Policy," opens with a chapter about
assessing risks and using cost-benefit analyses. This is
followed by chapters on air pollution, solid wastes, hazardous
wastes, and the development of environmental policy.
Throughout the book, each chapter begins with a statement of
objectives and a chapter outline. Each chapter ends with a
half-page summary, a list of key terms, and a short set of
questions that are not difficult. (I have seen no mathematical
questions whatsoever.)
Near the end of almost every chapter, the writers present a boxed
"Issues and Analysis" feature that requires students to ponder
what they have learned and to try applying their knowledge to a
real situation or problem. Topics considered in the "Issues and
Analysis" exercises include the restoration of ecosystems, the
population explosion in Mexico, soil erosion in Virginia, energy
development in China, the California Water Plan, and the flow of
air pollutants across national boundaries. These exercises seem
to be the most challenging ones in the book, and they can be used
as the bases for student essays or for lively class discussions.
They also have some drawbacks. In many cases, students are
asked to resolve complex questions that have no clear answers and
that cause passionate debate among educated adults and even among
experts in scientific, political and ethical affairs. In such
instances, the students can do little but offer poorly informed,
sophomoric opinions. Where is the science in that?
On page 90, for example, students are asked to decide whether
"society" should bear the cost of removing land from cultivation
and replanting it with prairie plants or temperate-forest trees.
(The answer will depend chiefly on whether you are a Democrat or
a Republican, rather than on any scientific principles.) On page
123 students must decide whether the government of the United
States should be involved in setting Mexico's population policy.
(Really!) And on page 359: "Should there be a series of
international agreements to control and regulate the movement of
airborne pollutants across international boundaries?"
Contemplation of such weighty questions may do something to
promote the learning process, but (if I may judge by my own
experience in high school) students will learn more, and will
gain more intellectual satisfaction, by grappling problems that
can actually be solved.
Perhaps, however, I am being too critical. There is much that is
good in this book. It contains an abundance of useful
photographs, maps, schematics and charts (but relatively few
tables), and it has many informative sidebars, headlined "Global
Perspective" or "Environmental Close-Up." Several of the "Global
Perspective" items present eye-opening information that has come
to light fairly recently, such as information about the ghastly
generation and dumping of nuclear wastes in the Soviet Union
(pages 182 and 183), the appalling environmental degradation
fostered by communist regimes in Eastern Europe (pages 402 and
403), and the death of the Aral Sea as a result of Soviet
water-diversion projects (page 310). Most of the "Environmental
Close-Up" articles describe issues or case histories involving wildlife
or fisheries, but the one on pages 114 and 115 deals with
contraceptive technology and illustrates eight different
contraceptive devices.
My complaint about the weighty "Issues and Answers" boxes
notwithstanding, I regard Environmental Science: A Study of
Interrelationships as a well written, well organized, up-to-date
book. Modest in scope, even-handed its presentation of issues,
it succeeds in presenting much information without being
intimidating. It may not be the book of choice for a class of
serious students who are majoring in science, but it is a fine
book for most students who -- even if they lack a strong aptitude
for science -- want to know something about how the world works.
To teachers who want a book that looks more deeply into basic
science, I recommend Wadsworth's Environmental Science:
Sustaining the Earth (1993) or -- even better -- Saunders's
Environmental Science (1990), which remains my favorite.
Teachers must be aware, however, that these two books project
activist approaches to environmental ethics and environmental
affairs. In this respect they are different from the book that
I have reviewed here, which does not engage in much advocacy.
This textbook falls well short of excellence, however, because it
has been poorly designed and is hard to read. Its pages are
often so clumsily laid out, and so badly fragmented by synthetic
sidebars and other boxed items, that the text is hard to follow
and the logic of the material is obscured. To use this book
successfully, I believe, students must be able to concentrate
well and must be able to integrate material that has been
needlessly and arbitrarily broken up.
According to the preface, Environmental Science was conceived as
a book for a one-semester, introductory college course. In a
high-school setting, I believe, it should be regarded as a book
for an honors course that would span an entire school year and
would include plenty of time for research projects and reports.
If high-school teachers try to rush through this book in one
semester, they will have to sacrifice much of its value: Almost
every chapter presents topics and questions that merit deeper
study, and students should be encouraged to dig into these.
Environmental Science is divided into five major parts. Part One
offers a chapter about the scope and concerns of environmental
science, followed by a chapter titled "Environmental Ethics."
This second chapter is well done, in terms of ideas and
exposition, and it includes a good passage that explains three
fundamental approaches to nature: the development ethic, the
preservation ethic, and the conservation ethic. But alas, it
also provides an especially fierce demonstration of the
fragmentation and irrational organization that characterize the
book as a whole: Though the chapter spans only seventeen pages,
it has nine boxed sidebars or feature articles. At least one
boxed item turns up on every spread, and the nine together
account for more than seven pages! Some of them have no
particular relevance to the chapter's text, though they present
interesting information which would have been appropriate in
later parts of the book. Some others seem patently synthetic:
Information that belongs in the text has been put into sidebars,
for no evident reason except to make sidebars. Even the
definition of the term ethics, which is surely essential to any
discussion of "Environmental Ethics," has been shunted into a
sidebar! Some designer, I guess, decided that the chapter had to
have nine boxed items, no matter how badly this might degrade the
writers' work or impede students' efforts to understand the
material.
Part Two (5 chapters, 92 pages, 18 boxed items) is an
introduction to ecology. It gets off to a lame start, but then
it becomes good. The lame start is an absurd chapter in which
the writers pretend to describe science, scientific thinking,
basic chemistry and basic physics -- all in nine pages! Of
course, they don't even come close, and the chapter is just a
list of terms, virtually devoid of any explanation or
exemplification. It presumably is intended to make Environmental
Science more salable by implying that this book can be used even
by students who haven't had a physics course or a chemistry
course. I suspect, however, that such students will find the
chapter baffling, discouraging and useless. Even if they read
every word of it, it will not equip them to understand the bits
of physics and chemistry that they will encounter in later
chapters.
The rest of Part Two deals with biology, and it includes a lot of
good work. The writers do a creditable job of outlining the
major modes of interaction between organisms and environments,
and they successfully introduce such basic concepts as the
community and the ecosystem. However, some serious trouble
emerges in chapter 6, "Population Principles," which purports to
describe population dynamics and which reproduces the
fundamental mistakes and misconceptions that often are seen in
high-school biology books. The writers ignore the distinctions
between global populations and local populations, and they say
that the growth of any population is determined by the
population's birth rate and death rate. That is true sometimes
but not generally, and it doesn't provide a reliable basis for
analyzing population dynamics. In the general case, the size of
a population is influenced not only by births and deaths but also
by immigration and emigration. No student can understand why
populations expand or contract if he imagines that births and
death are the only factors involved.
In chapter 7, "Human Population Issues," the writers try to
rectify their mistake by making a vague reference to immigration
-- but not to emigration -- as a "political" factor that can
affect the growth of human populations. (In fact, immigration
rates and emigration rates are no more "political" than birth
rates or death rates are; governments regularly adopt policies
aimed at influencing all of these.) At a time when immigration
is playing a major role in the destructive expansion of the
population of the United States, the trivialization of
immigration in Environmental Science is quite unacceptable.
Also unacceptable is the "Environmental Close-Up" sidebar about
methods of contraception. In trying to show how effective each
method is, the writers give an "average pregnancy rate per 100
women per year," but some of the numbers are inscrutable. For
contraceptive pills, the average rate is given as "0.1-1"; for
intrauterine devices, "1-6"; for the combination of a diaphragm
and a spermicidal jelly, "2-20"; for vaginal foams, "2-29"; for
condoms, "3-36"; and so on. Each of these presumably denotes a
range of averages, based on observations of several different
populations, but there is no explanation of how the observed
efficacy of a given technique can vary by 1,000% or more, even if
different populations are involved. (The writers' nebulous
allusion to "individual fertility differences and the degree of
care employed in the use of each method" is utterly inadequate.)
Worse, the "average pregnancy rate" for abstinence is given as
"0" -- which is patently silly. The reliability of abstinence,
like the reliability of any other birth-control method, is
finite: Efforts to practice abstinence will entail some failures,
and some of the failures will result in pregnancies. The writers
evidently don't grasp this.
On the other hand, the writers deserve praise for their alert,
iconoclastic passage about the demographic-transition model of
population growth. The demographic-transition model (a dubious
construct based chiefly upon patterns of economic and social
evolution in Europe and North America) suggests that if a human
population becomes industrialized, its birth and death rates
fall, and its size becomes stable. The writers of Environmental
Science question whether such a model has significance in today's
world:
A second concern is the time element. With the world population
increasing as rapidly as it is, industrialization probably cannot
occur fast enough to have a significant impact on population
growth. . . .
When Europe and North America passed through the demographic
transition, they had access to large expanses of unexploited
lands, [either at home or in colonies]. This provided a safety
valve for expanding populations during the early stages of the
transition. Without this safety valve, it would have been
impossible to deal adequately with the population while
simultaneously encouraging economic development. Today,
less-developed countries may be unable to accumulate the necessary
capital to develop economically, since an ever-increasing
population is a severe economic drain.
Here is an important topic indeed -- all the more important
because notions about demographic transitions have figured in
some of the sillier foreign-aid schemes that the United States
has pursued from time to time. Teachers who would like to study
this matter should be sure to read "Optimism and Overpopulation,"
by Virginia Abernethy, in The Atlantic Monthly for December 1994.
Part Three (3 chapters, 62 pages, 14 boxed items) is a sober
survey of energy sources and energy-conversion technologies. The
writers have avoided boosterism and gee-whizzing, and they seem
not to have made any gross errors. Some of their statistics are
obscure because the units of measurement aren't explained, and
the passage about wind power (in chapter 9) doesn't tell that
wind turbines are alarmingly destructive to large birds, but
classroom teachers can easily provide their students with the
information that the writers have omitted. Some of the sidebars
in Part Three are legitimate and well done, and I particularly
commend the ones titled "The James Bay Power Project" and "The
Alaska Pipeline," both in chapter 9. Chapter 10, about nuclear
power, is useful but jerky. The writers have tried to cover too
much in 19 pages, and the designer has only made things worse.
For example, the section called "Reactor Safety -- The Effects of
Three Mile Island and Chernobyl" actually deals with Chernobyl
alone; material about the Three Mile Island accident has been
diverted to a sidebar, for no apparent reason but to satisfy the
designer's whim. Similarly, the section on "Decommissioning
Costs" is interrupted by a clumsy, misplaced sidebar called "The
Nuclear Legacy of the Soviet Union."
Part Four (5 chapters, 132 pages, and 32 boxed items) is titled
"Human Influences on Ecosystems." It starts with chapter 11,
"Human Impact on Resources and Ecosystems," a mediocre effort
that dwells on terrestrial and freshwater systems, virtually
ignores the seas, and finally disintegrates into a pile of
sidebars. The other chapters in Part Four -- dealing with
land-use planning, soils, agriculture, and water management -- are
better, and the water-management chapter has good, legitimate
sidebars about the collapse of fisheries in Lake Victoria and
about attempts to clean up the Ganges. What is disappointing is
that the writers have failed to introduce the tragedy of the
commons, the explanatory principle that is essential for
understanding a lot of the material that Part Four presents. If
the writers had understood how important that principle is, they
could have used it as a unifying theme.
Part Five (5 chapters, 86 pages, and 30 boxed items) is called
"Pollution and Policy." It begins with chapter 16, a cogent
examination of approaches to assessing risks, costs and
benefits. I especially like the section "Concerns About the Use
of Cost-Benefit Analysis," in which the writers cite a famous
observation by E.F. Schumacher:
Another highlight of chapter 16 is the sidebar that alerts
students to fake "green" advertising claims. I wish that the
writers had also told about fake "green" organizations -- i.e.,
organizations which oppose environmental legislation and controls
while hiding behind deceptive names that suggest
pro-environmental sentiments. (Some of these outfits are described
in The Greenpeace Guide to Anti-Environmental Organizations,
which can be ordered from Odonian Press, P.O. Box 7776, Berkeley,
California 94707.)
The tragedy of the commons shows up eventually, and much too
late, on page 336. And predictably, this basic principle has
been stuck into a sidebar! That is sheer absurdity. If the
person who designed Environmental Science were designing a
physics book, would he turn the conservation of momentum into a
sideshow?
As I said at the outset, Environmental Science is a good book
that could have been excellent. I recommend it, but only for use
by students who can cope with its quirks.
Max Rodel is a consulting environmental chemist and a registered
environmental assessor in the state of California. His major
professional interest is the chemistry of natural aquatic
systems, including the fates of pollutants. He lives and works
in Mill Valley.
William J. Bennetta is a professional editor, a fellow of the
California Academy of Sciences, the president of The Textbook
League, and the editor of The Textbook Letter. He writes
frequently about the propagation of quackery, false "science" and
false "history" in schoolbooks.
Reviewing a science book for high-school honors courses
1995. 431 pages. ISBN: 0-697-15906-X (paperback), 0-697-15907-8
(hardback).
Wm. C. Brown Publishers, 2460 Kerper Boulevard, Dubuque, Iowa 52001.
This Fine, Up-to-Date Book
Sometimes Asks Too MuchMax G. Rodel
Environmental Science: A Study of Interrelationships is an
unpretentious, well focused and concisely written book, designed
for use in a one-semester college course. It can serve equally
well in a one-semester honors course for high-school students,
especially a course arranged for students who are not majoring in
science.
Environmental science is an interdisciplinary area of study that
includes both applied and theoretical aspects of human impact on
the world. Since humans are generally organized into groups,
environmental science must deal with the areas of politics,
social organization, economics, ethics, and philosophy. Thus,
environmental science is a mixture of traditional science,
societal values, and political awareness.
I wish to speak a word for Nature, for absolute freedom and
wildness, as contrasted with a freedom and culture merely civil .
. . to regard man as an inhabitant, or a part and parcel of
Nature, rather than a member of society.
Sound Content and Writing,
Undermined by Bad DesignWilliam J. Bennetta
Environmental Science: A Study of Interrelationships is a good
book that could have been excellent. The writers have chosen
their topics well, have produced a body of material that shows
few serious blunders, and have succeeded in integrating
scientific ideas and findings with economic, technological and
cultural information. As far as content is concerned,
Environmental Science is a good, concentrated account of what is
happening on Earth during the current age of ecological collapse.
Can the historical pattern exhibited by Europe and North America
be repeated in the less-developed countries? Europe, North
America, Japan, and Australia passed through this transition
period when world population was lower and when energy and
natural resources were still abundant. It is doubtful whether
these supplies are adequate to allow for the industrialization of
the major portion of the world currently classified as less
developed.
Cost-benefit analysis is a procedure by which the higher is
reduced to the level of the lower and the priceless is given a
price. All it can do is lead to self-deception or the deception
of others; for to undertake to measure the immeasurable is
absurd . . . what is worse, and destructive of civilization, is
the pretense that everything has a price or, in other words, that
money is the highest of all values.

return to top
go to Home Page
read our Index List, which shows all the textbooks, curriculum manuals,
videos and other items that are considered on this Web site
contact The Textbook League by e-mail