
Biological Science: A Molecular Approach
[Editor's note: Two reviews of the sixth edition ran in The
Textbook Letter for September-October 1994, under these
headlines: "A Valuable Textbook with a Dubious Title" and "It's
Tried and Mostly True, but It Could Be a Lot Better."]
The new edition, like the sixth, is well written, concise and
appropriate for high-school students. Most of the illustrations
are excellent, and most of the sidebars and special articles and
appendices are useful. While the book does not focus on
molecular biology as strongly as it could and should, I would not
hesitate to use it in a high-school course. For teachers who
want to move away from traditional biology books, Biological
Science: A Molecular Approach is a top choice.
What about teachers who already are using the sixth edition?
Should they spend their limited funds to buy the seventh? The
answer here is a firm no. The differences between the two
versions are too few and too small to justify such an
expenditure.
When I analyzed the sixth edition, I said that the BSCS writers
had missed important opportunities to develop the "molecular
approach" promised by the book's title. These failings persist
in the new edition, and they seem to be all the more obvious
because molecular biology has advanced so much since 1990. For
example, the book still says little about the molecular basis of
cancer or about how humans are damaged, at the molecular level,
by tobacco smoke or by industrial pollutants. We know a great
deal about these matters now, and they should be emphasized in
any introductory biology text that professes to take a molecular
approach to biology, but they do not receive enough attention in
this BSCS book.
Another disappointment is the writers' handling of AIDS. The
"Focus on AIDS" sidebar (page 465) has been changed, but I would
not say that it has been improved or that it tells students what
they need to know. The section about AIDS on page 3 has been
rewritten and has acquired a new title: It is now called "AIDS --
A Serious Global Problem," though it does not say anything at
all about where AIDS occurs, or anything to suggest that AIDS is
"global." The rewritten text does acknowledge that the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) evolves rapidly, but it fails to
explain this point in molecular terms. The rapid molecular
evolution of HIV (and of influenza viruses, too) could have been
used as the starting point for a discussion of why epidemics
recur as pathogens undergo modification.
Chapter 14, "Development in Animals," has been reworked, but the
three studies that it emphasizes were done in 1952, in the
mid-1970s, and in the 1920s respectively. There still is no hint of
the major advances that we have made in understanding molecular
aspects of animal development, such as the molecular basis of
body plans. At the end of the chapter, a "Biological Challenges"
article about fruit flies has been replaced by an article about
slime molds, which aren't even animals. (Will students be
thrilled by this? Does the substitution of a slime-mold article
for a fruit-fly article serve any pedagogic function?) After
some three decades of quiescence, the scientific study of
development has begun to move again. Students deserve an
up-to-date chapter that reflects this.
Many illustrations have been replaced or have been reprinted with
new colors, but few of these changes seem to have any
instructional purpose. Some of the color changes may reflect
constraints imposed by the printing process, but I doubt it; and
I fail to see that anything has been gained by substituting a
pretty picture of newly hatched flickers for a pretty picture of
a newly born opossum (page 314), or substituting one pretty
picture of a lizard for another pretty picture of a lizard (page
358), or substituting one pretty picture of a leaf for another
pretty picture of a leaf (page 426). Such changes may help to
make work for illustrators, or may help to make the book more
marketable by making it look "new," but neither of those
functions has anything to do with good science or with education.
(To be fair, I must acknowledge that two of the new illustrations
seem to do some good. In the chapter about immune systems, the
new figures 20.14 and 20.15 are better instructional tools than
were the analogous figures in the sixth edition.)
While many pictures have been changed for no perceptible reason,
some illustrations that definitely should have been improved or
removed are still in place. For example, page 8 still has two
pictures and a caption which suggest that the clipping of dogs'
ears has something to do with Lamarck's views of heredity and
evolution. That is not correct. [Please see "The Imaginary
Lamarck" in TTL for September-October 1994.] The unit about
evolution still has only one illustration showing a phylogenetic
tree based on biochemical similarities; the tree is still
mislabeled, and the caption still does not indicate what kind of
molecule was studied.
Some revisions in the new book's text and sidebars suggest
attempts to achieve "political correctness." But at the same
time, the writers have eliminated a biographical article about
the remarkable Barbara McClintock, who has been an inspiration to
at least two generations of women scientists.
By now, the BSCS writers should have started work on yet another
edition. I hope that they will do a better job of exploiting
opportunities to take a "molecular approach" to high-school
biology.
Are you listening, BSCS?
David L. Jameson is a senior research fellow of the Osher
Laboratory of Molecular Systematics at the California Academy of
Sciences. He has written books about evolutionary genetics and
the genetics of speciation, and he is a coauthor of a
college-level general-biology text.
Reviewing a high-school book in biology
Seventh edition, 1996. 817 pages. ISBN: 0-669-31600-8.
Copyrighted by the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study,
Colorado Springs, Colorado. Published by D.C. Heath and
Company, 125 Spring Street, Lexington, Massachusetts 02173.
The Revisions Are Feeble,
the Book Is Still ValuableDavid L. Jameson
Biological Science: A Molecular Approach, developed by the
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS), is the venerable
textbook commonly called the BSCS Blue Version or just "the BSCS
Blue." The seventh edition, dated in 1996, is little changed
from the sixth edition (which was issued in 1990), and all the
major points that I made in my review of the sixth are still
applicable.
On page 274 a "Biological Challenges" article about sex
chromosomes has been replaced by an article on the human genome
project, but the new piece is very weak. It is out-of-date by
five years, it fails to describe what the project is really
about, it gives scant attention to the remarkable, rapid
successes that the project has produced, and it has a lot of
dubious material about "concerns" raised by "critics" who
evidently have no names. (For example: "Some critics believe
that the genome project gives too much emphasis to the genetic
components of human characteristics while ignoring the
environmental components." Is that really supposed to be a
criticism? How could a gene-mapping project give too much
emphasis to genes? Would any rational person expect a
gene-mapping project to emphasize "environmental components"?)

return to top
go to Home Page
read the Index List, which shows all the textbooks, curriculum manuals,
videos and other items that are considered on this Web site
contact William J. Bennetta by e-mail