
Chemistry 2000
The organization of the booklets is somewhat eccentric since the
first, second and third booklets are collectively called Book 1,
while the fourth and fifth booklets are called Book 2. The third
booklet looks like an afterthought. It has anomalous
page-numbers that don't comply with the sequence of page-numbers used
in the first, second, fourth and fifth.
Earlier versions of Chemistry 2000 -- published in 1978, 1987,
1990 and 1993 -- had the title ALCHEM, and that title still shows
up at many points in Chemistry 2000. In the fourth booklet, for
example, an "Acknowledgements" blurb extends thanks to "the
writers and consultants involved in the production of ALCHEM
2000," and a note exhorts the student to "follow the ALCHEM
worksheets." Moreover, the name ALCHEM appears as a label at the
bottom of every page in each booklet. The continued use of the
ALCHEM title is presumably attributable to sloppy editing.
Today nearly every issue of any major newspaper contains at
least one article that has a chemical theme. This does not mean,
however, that a modern chemistry textbook can simply reprint
portions of newspaper articles to show that chemistry is topical,
or that a book merely needs to give tidbits of information about
the lead-chamber process and the Solvay process. It means that a
modern text has to explain, in some detail, such subjects as air
pollution and water pollution; it also means that the text must
explain the chemistry of mercury or lead, for example, so
students can understand why the level of mercury or lead in
drinking water is a matter of interest.
Clearly, a chemistry book can't give detailed treatment to every
topic that has societal implications, but it should consider
selected topics in ways that will help students to see that some
societal problems can be solved only by applying principles of
chemical science. The book should also show that every one of
these problems involves unknown or immeasurable factors, and
that there seldom is a single "correct" or perfect solution.
Students should understand that, most often, all that we can do
is to base our decisions on the best science that is available at
the time, recognizing that our knowledge is imperfect and is
clouded by uncertainty.
These standards for judging a chemistry text seem particularly
applicable to Chemistry 2000. The slogan Science Technology
Society appears on the covers of the first and fourth booklets,
where it acts as a sort of subtitle, and the accompanying
artwork includes a logo formed from the letters STS. Such
features are clearly intended to suggest that Chemistry 2000
emphasizes connections between classroom chemistry and societal
concerns.
The treatment of fundamental chemistry in Chemistry 2000 is
relatively thorough. The discussion of chemical thermodynamics,
for example, acknowledges both the "drive toward minimum energy
(minimum enthalpy)" and "the drive toward maximum randomness
(maximum entropy)," though it does not show how enthalpy and
entropy are combined in the concept of free energy. The unit
about chemical kinetics includes diagrams to explain how a
catalyst facilitates a reaction by lowering the activation
energy. The unit about acids and bases presents both the
Arrhenius and the Bronsted-Lowry concepts, and buffers are
covered well. In the unit on electrochemistry, the writers give
careful definitions of cathode and anode -- which is more than we
can say for the writers of some college texts.
The discussion of gases goes into considerable detail about
manometers, pressure units and the ideal gas laws, and it even
has an exposition of the sources of van der Waals forces. The
writers generally use the kilopascal (kPa), rather than the
atmosphere or the pascal itself, as their unit of pressure.
There is some advantage in doing this, since pressure-volume
products expressed in kPa-L are equivalent to pressure-volume
products expressed in Pa-m3, an SI unit equal to
the joule. As a result, R has the same value in gas-law
calculations that it has in energy calculations. The writers of
most college textbooks haven't figured this out yet.
What is equally important is that Chemistry 2000 is well written.
I have found very few places where the writers have made
misstatements about science. The glossary (which appears in the second book
let and in the fifth) has a few items that could be
picked at, and the word desiccant is misspelled, but most of the
definitions are well formulated. In both the glossary and the
main text, the writers spell liter as "litre" and meter as
"metre"; these spellings (which probably reflect the fact that
Chemistry 2000 was originally developed for sale in Canada) are
acceptable, but they may be confusing to students in the United
States.
The writers have attempted to make their material student-
friendly in various ways, including the use of a cartoon figure
named Marvin the Mole. Marvin is introduced at the beginning of
the first booklet, where the student learns that Marvin was born
at 6:02 on October 23. Eventually it becomes clear that this is
a device that helps students to remember Avogadro's number.
The result of all this is that Chemistry 2000 is a fairly
teachable collection of materials, provided that one can be happy
with paperbound booklets in which text is mixed with consumable
worksheets and quizzes.
The second booklet includes a special "Environmental & Social
Issues Index" for Book 1, and the fifth booklet has an
"Environmental & Social Issues Index" for Book 2. Each index
directs us to some 60 different items. When we look at the items
themselves, however, we find that they generally are skimpy and
obsolete. Most of them are merely bits and pieces taken from the
popular press, with few details and little or no explanation.
For example:
The second booklet has an unnumbered page that is devoted to the
stratospheric-ozone problem. It covers some chlorine chemistry
and then makes some wild suggestions for using man-made ozone to
replace the ozone that is being destroyed by CFCs. This
discussion represents a start in the right direction, even though
the science that it presents is not up to par.
As a whole, Chemistry 2000 is commendable for its scientific
accuracy, and it seems to be evolving toward something that could
be used in giving a modern high-school chemistry course. This
evolution seems to be proceeding at a glacial pace, however, and
Chemistry 2000 has a long way to go before the publisher will be
justified in suggesting that these booklets have an STS emphasis.
Perhaps the rate of improvement will accelerate as future
editions are published.
Rollie J. Myers is a physical chemist, a specialist in
spectroscopy, and a professor of chemistry, emeritus, at the
University of California at Berkeley. He has taught introductory
chemistry at that institution, and he has directed a summer
program (sponsored by the National Science Foundation) for high-
school chemistry teachers.
Reviewing LeBel's high-school chemistry series
Book 1 1994
ISBN: 0-920008-51-8
Book 2 1996
ISBN: 0-920008-52-6
J.M. LeBel Enterprises, 6420 Meadowcreek Drive, Dallas,
Texas 75240.It's Scientifically Accurate,
but It Needs a Lot More WorkRollie J. Myers
Chemistry 2000 consists of five paperbound booklets that
evidently are meant to be used only once, by one high-school
student. In each booklet, pages of narrative text and
illustrations are interspersed with worksheets that the student
has to complete as he makes his way through the subject matter.
Standards and Requirements
Covering the Fundamentals
Skimpy Bits and Pieces
