
Modern Earth Science
Much of the good news has to do with the illustrations,
activities, and other items that augment the book's main text:
As a teacher, I am always interested in learning whether a "new"
version of a textbook is truly new, or whether it's an old book
with a different cover, some add-ons, and a higher price. I
therefore have compared this 1998 version of Modern Earth
Science with the 1989 version, as described by Arthur J.
Boucot and Richard A. Smith in The Textbook Letter for
May-June 1990. Guess what! -- most of the factual and conceptual
errors that Boucot and Smith saw in the 1989 version are still in
place, nine years later. They include wrong descriptions of the
geologic nature of plains, the formation of coal, and the
formation of placer deposits; an erroneous attempt to classify
landforms; and even a startlingly wrong notion (which Boucot
described as "laughable") about the location of Pangaea. In a
number of places, Holt has reprinted erroneous material
word-for-word.
Smith's evaluation of the 1989 Modern Earth Science
included some remarks about the book's Unit 5, which deals
largely with paleontology:
All of that is still true. In the 1998 book, Unit 5 is still
inadequate and still lacks an integrating theme, and its
depiction of organic evolution is incoherent and wrong. On page
347 students read that natural selection is often called "the
survival of the fittest." Then the students are subjected to a
passage which perpetuates two erroneous notions -- that natural
selection requires "environmental changes," and that individual
organisms can alter themselves to suit "environmental changes"
and thus become more "fit." Nothing in the 1998 book helps
students to distinguish between the fact of evolution and the
theory of evolution, and nothing in this book can help students
to learn how natural selection really works.
Some of the factual errors that Boucot and Smith saw in the 1989
book have disappeared -- either because the passages in which
they occurred have been discarded entirely, or because Holt was
able to correct them by changing only a line or two or type.
This is little comfort. It is clear that Holt's revising of
Modern Earth Science has been sporadic and superficial,
with most of the effort directed toward the creation of
eye-catching novelties. Holt has not made any systematic attempt to
repair the many mistakes in the book's main text.
Nor has Holt made any serious attempt to update the book as a
whole. Yes, there is a feature article about the Galileo
spacecraft's journey to Jupiter, as I noted earlier -- but the
book never even mentions the spectacle that we witnessed in 1994,
when Jupiter was struck by the remnants of Periodic Comet
Shoemaker-Levy 9. There is a boxed sidebar about the earthquake
that wreaked destruction on Kobe, Japan, in 1995, but there is
nothing about the Northridge, California, earthquake of 1994.
There is nothing about recent investigations of Chicxulub Crater,
the buried impact crater which provides impressive evidence that
a big comet or asteroid collided with Earth some 65 million
years ago. A picture-caption on page 608 declares categorically
that "In 1996, scientists discovered fossil evidence of primitive
microorganisms" in a meteorite that supposedly originated on Mars
-- but that claim is outdated and misleading. In more recent
studies of the meteorite, other scientists have judged the
"fossil evidence" to be enigmatic and inconclusive.
Here's a little more bad news. Modern Earth Science has
30 "Small-Scale Investigation" activities (one in each chapter),
but too many of them seem inappropriate because of the materials
and preparation time that they require. However, they may be
useful as demonstrations, to be performed by a selected student
or by the teacher.
Like many other schoolbooks, the 1998 Modern Earth Science
gives the impression that it has been assembled from bits and
pieces, by people who didn't know as much as they should have
known about the subject matter. There is no way to infer who
those people were. The book's title page shows the names of four
alleged authors but doesn't identify them. Later we encounter an
introduction (on pages xvi and xvii) that is signed by one of
those four, Robert J. Sager, and we read that Sager teaches at
Pierce College, in Lakewood, Washington. The three other
"authors" remain mystery-men whose whereabouts are unknown. On
the other hand, Holt has furnished (on page iii) an impressive
list of alleged "reviewers," each identified by affiliation and
location. The contrast between this display and Holt's
withholding of information about the book's so-called authors is
striking.
Anne C. Westwater retired in 1997 from a twenty-year career as a
science teacher, including some fifteen years as a teacher of
biology, earth science and environmental science at Napa High
School (in Napa, California). She now lives at The Sea Ranch (in
Sonoma County, California) and works as a consultant in the
application of brain research to educational practice.
Reviewing a high-school book in earth science
1998. 714 pages. ISBN of the student's edition: 0-03-050609-3.
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.,
1120 South Capital of Texas Highway, Austin, Texas 78746.
(This company is a division of Harcourt Brace & Company,
which is a part of Harcourt General Inc.)
A Superficial Revision of an Old, Weak Book
Anne C. Westwater
There's both good and bad news about the 1998 version of
Modern Earth Science. I'll start with the good news --
but I hope that you will read beyond that, because the bad news
about Holt's book is troubling.
The Bad News
Compared with what it should be, it is pitifully thin. It is
also incoherent. Paleontologists integrate their information
around the theme of organic evolution, the principle that
explains the succession seen in the fossil record. Holt's
writers do not do this -- indeed, they have no integrating theme
at all -- and they treat organic evolution as if it were only a
sidelight or afterthought.
The Bottom Line
